Nibiru ‒ Alpha and Omega 

A Reflection on Stellar Orbits






English menu



Page 1



Page 2



 Update December 2023



 Special report



 Nibiru Blog -
Adonis Apollyon
































The Ancients spoke of a very special member of our solar system, not so much known to modern man. Perhaps a mini-sun in the making, perhaps only a recurrent visitor of death. This object; Nemesis, Nibiru, Ashar, Marduk or Hercolubus; can we grasp its nature?


     Disclaimer: Please note that this is a non-scientific site, the content is a mix of Science,
Intuition and Mythology. If you consider Science, and Science alone, to be the only source
      of true knowledge, you might want to surf elsewhere. But if you have an open mind, you
      are more than Welcome to join me in a humble Reflection on the Nibiru mystery.





The Scholars Immanuel Velikovsky and Zecharia Sitchin have done a tremendous amount of work. This has allowed us to reach a better understanding of the illusive Nibiru. There is no need to repeat what they have stated since I almost entirely agree with their basic concepts. Furthermore, the Internet is crowded with as much information on the subject as anybody could want. I only wish to add a few more pieces to the puzzle.

In this essay, I will talk about the dark companion of our sun. There has been some confusion if the name 'Nibiru' refers to the star itself or one of its planets. From this point I will refer to the star as Nibiru and to the inhabited planet of this system as 'Anu'. The star Nibiru is believed to harbor at least seven major planets, together with a cloud of asteroids, gravel, dust and hydrocarbon components. This text is mainly concentrating on the star itself and its specific behavior.

Nibiru and our Sun

I do no longer believe the sun to be the predominant gravitational factor of our solar system. At this point I hold the star Nibiru to be the heavier part, although smaller in size than our sun. This astonishing claim, I base in most part on a small phrase in the epos "Enuma Elish", where Marduk (Nibiru) states: "If I, your avenger, Conquer Tiamat and give you life, Appoint an assembly, make my fate preeminent and proclaim it."

Tiamat, in the Enuma Elish text, should rightfully be named "Barbaru", the Sumerian name for the sun that existed before our present sun. Barbaru means "shining one". Another epithet for the same object was UR-BAR-RA, meaning "Wolf". Marduk/Nibiru fought and conquered this older massive sun and divided her in two, one part was our present sun and the other part was a heavier predecessor to the planet Jupiter, from which the planet Saturn later emerged.

When it comes to the magnetic force it is my conviction that Nibiru, even in this aspect, is the dominant part. We have learned from scientific studies that the suns magnetic field regularly changes direction in accordance to the 11-year solar cycle. There is reason to believe that the sun indeed has an iron core, perhaps a neutron core that generates the suns magnetic field. This core is not “fixed” in the midst of the sun; it’s believed to be floating at the solar center, easily flipping over every 11 years.

My conception of Nibiru is that it is a solid neutron star rather than a brown dwarf star. It may at one time have collapsed into its present state, formerly being a luminous, visible star. It’s my belief that Nibiru will once again, at some time, ignite to be a small but brilliant silver-shining star. Until that time, it will continue to be a hazardous object in our neighborhood, creating havoc from time to time. Since Nibiru was captured into our solar system in a distant past it isn’t, in my opinion, involved in a common Kepler-like orbit, I believe the orbit is highly eccentric.

Shifting orbital's

Let's assume the Nibiru's Period of Revolution to be 3600 years, give or take some years. If Nibiru evolved the sun in an ordinary Kepler orbit (with the sun at a focal point) it would move in at a great distance, outside all the planets, including Pluto. Yet the Sumerian legends clearly tell us that Nibiru's orbit crossed the solar system at the "Station of Jupiter", entering from below the ecliptic. It’s not far-fetched to consider the asteroid belt to be the debris from collisions between Nibiru's moons/planets and some earlier member of the solar system.

I suggest that stars have a variety of ways to evolve around each other, the most common one being the standard Kepler orbit. If two suns are closer to each other, then another orbital must be used. When it comes to Nibiru, I believe that it evolves around the sun in an eccentric manner (image to the right). The number of orbital's can certainly vary in different star systems,
from 1 (the Kepler orbit) up to nearly an infinite number. At present, I hold
the orbital's of Nibiru to be 6, with two houses of the Zodiac in each orbit.
              Click to enlarge

Nibiru rises from under the ecliptic in a clockwise direction, passes the orbit of Jupiter to proceed in an almost straight line up to a position well above the sun. There, the speed halts to a near standstill. Then Nibiru begins to "fall", this time moving in in a more curved path, very close to the orbit of Earth. The angle has now changed and the star will start on a new journey below the ecliptic. However, all the planets of the solar system have adapted to the new conditions and the ecliptic has shifted 180 + 60 degrees. This, in fact, is the true Precession of the Equinoxes!


The shifting of the ecliptic plane with 180 and 60 degrees respectively represents the twelve animal signs of the Zodiac, two signs per orbit. It is the star Nibiru that governs this movement, not some obscure wobble of the Earth axis. The shift from one of the signs of the Zodiac into another is therefore not gradual, it happens almost instantaneously, as Nibiru (coming in from above or below the Ecliptic) comes closer to the Sun. Two different cycles will be vital to our existence, one is the orbital period of Nibiru in relation to our sun. The other is the orbital "Great year", the completion of six orbits of Nibiru and our sun, corresponding to 21,966 years.


The tilting point

When Nibiru is at its farthest point from the sun, a certain effect occurs. The dark star tilts; magnetic north becomes magnetic south (and vice versa) and the rotation will appear to have changed direction.
The tilting starts gradually and is completed after passing the Aphelion point. This behavior, I suggest, is common procedure with neutron stars (and perhaps even planets) moving in highly elongated orbits. The star will now maintain its new magnetic and rotational properties until it has completed an entire orbit and is returning to its Aphelion once again.

The tilting of Nibiru at regular intervals gives an important clue as to why Earth gets so utterly devastated every now and then. During every other passage, Nibiru re-writes the Map of the solar system. The extent of the damage, however, varies. When Nibiru returns from above the ecliptic, the effect is not so severe. But when Nibiru approaches from below, then the Earth are compelled to flip like a spinning top. The magnetic and the rotational properties of Nibiru governs the influence on Earth, gravitation is an additional factor.


Please notice that planet Earth in reality flips around 180 degrees! What used to be the North pole is now the South pole and vice versa. The starry sky will appear to have changed based on the observation point of the inhabitants of Earth. Adding to this confusion is that the Sun will appear to rise in the west! This due to the fact that Earth has slowed down to a standstill, after which it resumes its rotation again, now in the other direction. This Pole shift is an extremely confusing event. And further more; the actual shifting of the Zodiac ages must partly be connected to the Pole shift itself (I used to think this solely took place during the return of Nibiru from above the ecliptic). No, evidence now points to Pole shifts being a vital part of the 'Zodiac engine'.

Planets adapting to Nibiru

When Nibiru enters from below the Ecliptic, it will have a different angle compared to the planets. The magnetic and rotational properties of the star are also reversed (from our point of view). Will the outermost planets (Uranus, Neptune and Pluto), occasionally be out of Nibiru's reach? Not when it comes to the magnetic alignment of the solar system, Nibiru is the absolute ruler!

The status of the Earth’s magnetic field as Nibiru approaches is vital. Since the incoming star now has a conflicting direction of its magnetic field, Earth will make a decisive 180-degree roll. This Pole Shift could be quite turbulent. A problem is that the Pole shift axis is never fixed, it can be located anywhere along the ecuator of Earth. Locations near to the Shift axis will not be very affected, places farther from the axis just might be hit by substantial tsunami waves. It’s getting clearer now that we must speak in terms of Big Shifts and Small Shifts. What happened at the time of Joshua, which was a Pole Shift event, and what happened at the time of Amos the prophet, when Nibiru returned to the deep below?

We know from the Ancients that Nibiru has a retrograde orbit, what is still uncertain is how long time it stays above the ecliptic plane. When Nibiru slows down to a near halt (at its highest position) it remains steady, no tilting of the star occurs. Is this Night Sun visible to the naked eye? It is likely that the star Nibiru lights up at regular intervals, when drawn closer to the sun. This is presumably an electric phenomenon which has to do with the fact that stars emit light, not from nuclear processes in the core, but rather from the process where electrons in space reacts with emitted solar protons (solar wind). Nibiru, being a Neutron star, doesn't have enough free protons to start this reaction by itself, but in the vicinity of the sun, the star "ignites". It's very likely that Nibiru should rightly be called a periodic 'pulsating star'; a Pulsar.

The rotational factor

Does a major Pole Shift occur at every passage of Nibiru? No, however there seems to be a strong correlation between the direction of a planets magnetic field and the direction of its rotation. If Nibiru has the opposite magnetic properties during a passage as Earth, the Earth axis will only “temporarily” be affected (both objects will have opposite direction of rotation). If Nibiru, on the other hand, has a reversed magnetic field (and an equal direction of rotation) the outcome will be very much different; the Earth will start to wobble and slow down on its rotation, at rotational stoppage the Earth will tilt to adjust to the magnetic direction of Nibiru. When rotation starts anew, it will be opposite once again to that of the lawgiver Nibiru.

This is key in understanding the full complexity of pole shifts. As Nibiru reaches its farthest point from the sun the star slowly heads back in a 180-degree turn. The rotation of the star will remain the same, but as the star is now inverted, the rotational direction will appear opposite to us. When Nibiru moves closer, Earth can’t simply reverse poles and be done with it; it has to adjust its rotational direction too. In doing that, Earth has to slow down its rotational speed to a halt before it can start rotating in the other direction. Now we can more easily comprehend sightings like a “fixed sun in the heaven” and “a night that would not end”.

Push and pull

Nibiru also changes the calendar at every passage. It seems that when Nibiru approaches from below the ecliptic it has built up tremendous speed. This speed is transferred to Earth through a “gravitational push” that increases the speed of Earth around the sun, giving us a year of 360 days. When Nibiru returns from its smaller loop above the ecliptic, the speed has decreased. This results in a “gravitational pull” at passage that again sets the year to a 365-day standard. Earth indeed has a long history of periodical calendar changes, due to Nibiru.


Continue to page 2


Copyright © 2023 J R S Nilsson. The information on this site may be freely reproduced
and distributed under the conditions that no changes are made to the information.