The huge climate scam

 
Carbon dioxide a made-up culprit

 

     

 

 

 

Debate

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

People with a basic education know that carbon dioxide is an atmospheric gas absolutely necessary for plant life. Through photosynthesis, atmospheric carbon dioxide converts into glucose and oxygen. How could this element be turned into a environmental culprit?


The tyranny of good will

It is time to be environmentally conscious, this driving force is so strong that the purpose seems to sanctify both goals, means and results. In other words, it is indifferent if the result is good for the environment in the end, it is more important to maintain a politically correct facade. That is the situation right now with regard to carbon dioxide and its impact on the climate. No one is asking basic questions about whether carbon dioxide is actually a documented harmful factor. Politicians need areas in which to prove themselves capable, it matters less whether the issues in question have any actual relevance or not. Common people want to eliminate their bad conscience by sorting garbage or donating to some organization. What you don't want to know, however, is that the garbage ends up in the same pit or that all the gifts get lost on the way to the gift recipients.

The fight against carbon dioxide emissions has become a religion and everyone worships at its altar, in different ways. Have you done your climate compensation? It's a common question that anyone can get today, whether you should have taken the car to work or gone by plane on the holiday trip. We more or less terrorize each other with intricate questions about fertilizers, coffee filters, fuel, geothermal heating, wood burning stoves, spray bottles, nail polish or powdered soups, all in one crazy mess. Afterwards, when discussion is over, we're off to the Sodastreamer and gleefully toast in the same gas we just rejected; Bingo! Wouldn't it be appropriate that we make a little distinction between the one and the other. The poisoning of our nature must of course be stopped, but carbon dioxide doesn't belong there, it's not a dangerous substance
.

 


Global warming

According to the news media, global warming is clearly man's fault, we are often and persistently fed the information that emissions are increasing, especially carbon dioxide. But wait now, let's look at the composition of the atmosphere for a moment. Our atmosphere consists of nitrogen, oxygen, carbon dioxide and small amounts of other gases. Nitrogen is a whopping 78%, oxygen 21% but carbon dioxide only 0.04%. The world's oceans account for most of this 4 hundredths of a percent of carbon dioxide, volcanoes spew out significant amounts but man's contributions, including our factories, are so microscopically small that they are barely measurable in a planetary perspective; we cannot influence the climate, we are too inconspicuous!

However, in terms of poisoning and environmental destruction, we are highly capable of bringing the planet down, of this there is no doubt. But when we talk about warming, there is another more influential actor; The sun! It is undoubtedly the solar activity that is most important for the Earth's climate, everything else pales in comparison. Any scientist who has any backbone and authority left must admit this fact. But the sun does not act on its own, there are factors that influence the sun and contribute to its oscillations, its cycles, its sunspots and bulges. We are talking here about cosmic activity of various kinds. Cosmic influences affect the sun, the sun in turn creates the conditions for climate, weather, wind and precipitation on earth
.
 

 

The intricate chain

More advanced research has clearly shown that it is the cosmic radiation that give rise to cloud formation. The stronger the radiation, the more clouds are formed. The sun is a regulating factor in this process. The outward solar wind of charged particles counteracts, reduces the influence of cosmic rays. In other words, an active sun produces less clouds and vice versa. A denser cloud cover naturally means that the solar radiation is reflected away, whereby the temperature drops. Higher solar activity naturally increases the temperature on Earth. This higher temperature in turn affects the carbon dioxide to increased levels. But please note; it is certainly not the other way around, as the environmental guru Al Gore persistently claimed; that the carbon dioxide in itself increases the temperature. This is only propaganda.

But the question remains; why this hocus pocus about carbon dioxide? The answer is highly controversial and a particularly hot potato. Our sun is not a single actor, we are in fact part of a binary system, a double star system. The other actor is a star commonly called Nibiru, it has seven main planets in its retinue. At certain intervals this star returns to our vicinity, which of course has consequences. An immediate consequence is that we get greater weather disturbances. Global warming is not an obvious effect, rather greater perturbations concerning wind, rain and effects of volcanoes i.e. seismic activity. Thus, this is the real cause of global turbulence, but in order not to reveal too much, the decision-makers pull a waltz, everyone joins the bandwagon! The elite can make huge profits on cutting CO2 emissions.

 


The greenhouse effect

Forget about carbon dioxide being a dangerous substance. The only way it could possibly be dangerous is if it accumulates in large quantities in a valley or similar. Carbon dioxide is heavier than oxygen and tends downwards. Theoretically, one could suffocate in a pit or mine where the gas has accumulated, but such large quantities are not found in nature. Nor is it true that carbon dioxide absorbs thermal radiation, as has been claimed. The theory of the greenhouse effect is that heat is trapped in a layer and does not radiate back out. This has been disproved with both satellite samples and with samples taken by weather balloons. In that case, the temperature would be highest in a layer up in the atmosphere, but something like that has not been measured. Accumulated heat always collects at the earth's surface.

Carbon dioxide is part of a natural cycle on earth. When the amount increases, the vegetation increases to a corresponding degree. Vegetation such as a forest binds water to itself, the humidity increases. The forest attracts clouds, a mutual dependence. The clouds contribute to the radiation from the sun being reflected away and the temperature lowers. When the temperature drops, the carbon dioxide is absorbed by water and plants. If the temperature rises again, carbon dioxide is released anew. Nature is aware, it has a self-regulating system where, among other things, carbon dioxide is an obvious ingredient. There is no chance that carbon dioxide would be a problem, quite the opposite. That the environmental movement has so unilaterally joined the greenhouse propagandists is sad, one wishes they were a little more educated
.
 

 

The environmental destruction, changing focus

Far too much time and resources are wasted on reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Instead, we should work more actively to reduce the amount of toxins in the environment and in our close surroundings. The debate about plastics and microplastics has started but the goods in the shop are still completely wrapped in plastic, as if they must be sterile. The air is polluted with very toxic 'chemtrails', which are so strong that it sometimes smells like 'burnt circuits', especially in the big cities. The food is made inedible with totally unnecessary and harmful E additives. Incredibly silly debates are held about the animals being an environmental problem. That cows and pigs fart too much, which would then contribute to the greenhouse effect. It prompted me to spontaneously write down a poem about this absurd, insane notio
:

 

 

"I, who merely released a fart,
is now an ECO criminal, for my part.
We must drill a hole in the ice,
preserve the fart in sealed device.
Safely it lingers for hundreds of years,
fancy the headache of future engineers."

 
 

References - (YouTube, worth seeing)

 

What if higher CO2 concentrations are actually good for plant growth?

 

Top 10 Facts that Prove CO2 Does NOT Drive Global Temperature

 

The Great Global Warming Swindle

 

 

 

Go back