Debate

A lot has happened since I first wrote this article. Then, in the early 2000s, a number of severe accidents had taken place; Kyschtym in 1957, Three Mile Island, Pennsylvania in 1979 and Chernobyl, Ukrainian SSR in 1986. Completely irreparable natural disasters, or..


With hindsight

We can trust the scientific community, they always provide a strictly scientific and objective picture of what our power supply looks like. Or maybe they don't? Could the oil industry, for example, be so powerful and influential that governments allow themselves to be corrupted by its lobbying? Perhaps, in fact, nuclear power has been so undermined by malicious rumors that its days may be seen as numbered? Has scaremongering and misinformation caused a perfectly useful source of energy to fall into disrepair? The oil industry is profitable, perhaps not nuclear power in the same way.

Nuclear power creates hazardous waste, we have learned. Spent fuel rods and energy depots that cannot be used must be stored for hundreds of thousands of years. Well, that's not true! But what about when a fuel hearth overheats; isn't a 'china syndrome' created where fuel melts straight down into the earth's crust, several kilometers? Oops, so that was a lie too! But the toxicity, is it true that uranium and plutonium are among the most toxic substances we know? What, not that either! You can even eat the substances! Yes, then we can use nuclear power without major risks at all! Imagine that!

Radioactive fallout?

But the radiation-affected area around Chernobyl, is it still dangerous to stay there? Obviously not, because the area has become a thriving oasis where plants and animals thrive. Strange really, the radiation was not at all as long-lived as has been said, not by a long shot. And the fallout over eastern Sweden, there is no danger of that either. There we went and measured Becquerel on meat and mushrooms, for several years, for no reason at all. Scare mongering, lies and cursed poetry. And this only for quick financial gain, to grab more billions, at the expense of the people.


Thorium fuel

Traditionally, uranium-235 has been used as fuel in nuclear power plants. When uranium-238 is used, plutonium is also formed, which is used for nuclear weapons. The desire to 'hook on' in the arms race is a major reason why many countries have used uranium in particular. Actually, it would have been better in many ways if the substance Thorium had instead been used for energy production. But the technology is not quite the same, which has led to many countries continuing to invest in the 'established' uranium fission.

Which fuel will eventually become the practice to use remains to be seen. What is required, however, is that the propaganda about the lethality of nuclear power ceases and is replaced by objective facts. When the danger is no longer a problem, it is necessary to think in new ways. The right form of nuclear power needs to be put into operation and the large scale needs to be replaced by small functional power plants for individual cities. Getting down to scale means that vulnerability ends, serviceability also improves significantly.

Alternative to nuclear power

Already today there are a number of excellent alternatives that are good from an environmental point of view. The method of extracting hydrogen from plain water is one of the most interesting. With the help of wind or water generators, an electric current is passed through ordinary water (electrolysis), which splits the water into hydrogen and oxygen. The hydrogen can be burned or used in fuel cells that produce electricity back. There are some problems with storing hydrogen but this is an obstacle that needs to be solved. The oil tycoons actively oppose hydrogen fuel, though the development cannot be stopped.

Wind turbines cannot meet all of our energy needs, but certainly a good 20-25%. A major problem has been the wind spinners' poor efficiency in winter. The leaves are sensitive to snow and ice and they damage, de facto, birds in flight. Produced electricity could, however, be stored as hydrogen in the summer, but there is no political will to develop this. The traditional wind spinner with three blades is deliberately inefficient and should be immediately replaced by new models with significantly higher efficiency. Wind power is sponsored (and opposed) by the oil industry, hence no progress.

Newer types of wind turbines have the generator placed at ground level, which in many ways improves serviceability and economy. Legitimate complaints about ground shaking generated by the large airborne turbines must be considered. A transition to ground-based and damped 'spins' is really the future. Many new prototypes exist, but of course these need to be released first and then you have to choose those that have the least environmental and health impact.

Solar cells convert the sun's light into electricity that can be used directly, stored in batteries or supplement the electricity grid. Research has come a long way and new discoveries are made continuously. There are already products, used to replace roofing with solar cell units. "Silicon solar cells" are cost-effective and can already be found today in places that are difficult to reach via the power grid. With the help of "smart windows" it is possible to regulate the solar radiation and thus save electricity because the energy used for air conditioning is significantly reduced. Solar cells are here to stay and they are constantly evolving.

The concept of "free energy" is a reality and individual innovators around the world have developed a number of different methods to extract the energy. The extracted energy does not arise from nothing but originates in the universe's ever-flowing "G-waves", a longitudinal waveform that propagates in vacuum. Unfortunately, the "energy mafia" actively works to assassinate, oppose or at best bribe inventors and their designs. The energy machines are tucked away to be forgotten and the energy companies can continue to rob the population of exorbitant fees for electricity, produced by burning traditional fossil fuels. Shameful!


Thorium fuel

Traditionally, uranium-235 has been used as fuel in nuclear power plants. When uranium-238 is used, plutonium is also formed, which is used for nuclear weapons. The desire to 'hook on' in the arms race is a major reason why many countries have used uranium in particular. Actually, it would have been better in many ways if the substance Thorium had instead been used for energy production. But the technology is not quite the same, which has led to many countries continuing to invest in the 'established' uranium fission.

Which fuel will eventually become the practice to use remains to be seen. What is required, however, is that the propaganda about the lethality of nuclear power ceases and is replaced by objective facts. When the danger is no longer a problem, it is necessary to think in new ways. The right form of nuclear power needs to be put into operation and the large scale needs to be replaced by small functional power plants for individual cities. Getting down to scale means that vulnerability ends, serviceability also improves significantly?

Non-profit hydropower

A very safe and efficient power source is, of course, hydropower, where the dammed power of the rivers is used by extracting electricity from turbines. A prerequisite is, of course, that the expansion takes place with a great deal of caution. The free exploitation of artificial dams means suffering and damage to the population upstream. Likewise, nature is hard pressed because water levels cannot necessarily be kept constant. A variant in hydropower is also when powerful oil companies allow water reservoirs to be emptied, solely to drive up oil prices; profit without consideration. Hydropower should be carefully regulated by the state itself. Profit maximization is not something that should be applied!

The destructive force
 

There are two fundamental "directions" for the energy in the Universe. What is celebrated in the West is the outward-directed energy (picture on the right) which is expressed, among other things, in concepts such as dynamite, the explosion engine and in the "Big Bang" creation myth. This energy is a force of death, it works only when it breaks down the existing structures. When the material used is exhausted, the energy runs out. It resembles a forest fire; when there is no longer anything combustible, the fire goes out.

The constructive power
 

The other "energy direction" in the Universe is an inward circular force that serves to build structures. In contrast to the outward force, an accumulation (image on the right) takes place in connection with the temperature falling. The process operates when galaxies, stars and planets condense out of rotating interstellar gas clouds. In order to be able to use the free energy in the cosmos, however, humanity must first distance itself with a united voice from "the disintegrating energy", then the free energy becomes available to us.

Dual agendas

Democracy in its true form might be good, but there must not be hidden motives that rule in the background. In order to be able to break the destructive trend, it is now high time to take the leaf from the mouth and work for good alternatives. We need to break the silence and openly express our opinions on various issues. Write submissions, make blogs, videos, websites and artwork. Discuss the situation with your acquaintances and form networks, but watch out when the network has become so large that it can be perceived as a threat, infiltrators then nestle in and seek out leading positions.

Planet Earth has, for a long time, acted on two fronts. An elite, above all in the military, has developed advanced technology that also exists outside the earth, they move freely in space and establish colonies on other planets. At the same time, ordinary people have been forced to make do with very primitive technology, we are almost back to the cave stage. Still, the advanced technology is hidden from us. Only slowly are improvements made in various areas. This is proclaimed with pomp and circumstance despite the fact that the elite are at least 30 years ahead in development. An injustice without end?

Since time immemorial, those in power have manipulated us into believing that we need to be ruled by an elite. But this elite are the worst criminals themselves, who without a trace of conscience smash the lives of defenseless people into rubble. We don't need their cynicism, their smoldering sourdough that poisons all social interaction. It is utterly hopeless to try to get these snakelings to change, they are beyond saving. Instead, we need to regain our original strength that we once had. We are complete, eternal universal beings who have every reason to steward our rightful inheritance, our life.

Referens: Nuclear Energy is not what you think it is

 
 

◄ Go back